How the Nobel Prizes Are Decided, Step by Step

Every October, a handful of names become globally famous overnight. A physicist in Tokyo, a novelist in Nairobi, an economist in Chicago wakes to a phone call from Stockholm and, within hours, joins one of the most exclusive clubs in the world. What almost nobody sees is the year of quiet, tightly guarded work that produced that phone call.

The Nobel Prizes are often spoken about as if a single committee sat in a room and picked winners. The reality is stranger and more interesting. There is no central Nobel jury. Instead, the prizes were set up under the 1895 will of the Swedish chemist and inventor Alfred Nobel, and that document handed the job to several different institutions. More than a century later, those same bodies still do the choosing.

Four institutions, not one

Nobel’s will named specific organisations to award the prizes, and the split has held ever since. The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences selects the laureates in physics and chemistry. The Nobel Assembly at the Karolinska Institute, a Stockholm medical university, chooses the prize in physiology or medicine. The Swedish Academy, a separate literary body, picks the prize in literature.

The peace prize is the outlier. Nobel decided it should be awarded not in Sweden but by a committee of five people appointed by the Norwegian parliament. Nobody has ever fully explained why he chose Norway, and historians still debate it, but the arrangement is why the peace prize ceremony happens in Oslo while every other prize is handed out in Stockholm.

There is also a fixture many people assume was part of the original set but was not. The prize in economic sciences was created in 1968 by Sweden’s central bank in memory of Nobel, and it is awarded by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences alongside the science prizes. It is not, strictly speaking, one of the original Nobel Prizes, though it is announced with them.

Who is allowed to nominate

This is the part that surprises most people. You cannot nominate someone for a Nobel Prize, and neither can I. The public has no role in the selection, and putting yourself forward disqualifies the nomination entirely.

Instead, each awarding body invites nominations from a defined pool of qualified people. That pool is large and international. It includes past laureates, members of the relevant academies, and thousands of senior professors and researchers at universities around the world, chosen so that no single country or institution dominates. For the peace prize, the eligible nominators include members of national parliaments and governments, certain international judges, and university professors in fields such as law, history and philosophy.

Those invited nominators send in their suggestions, usually by the end of January. A single prize can attract hundreds of names, and a popular candidate may be proposed by many people in the same year. Being nominated is therefore far less rare, and far less meaningful, than the public assumes. Because the lists are sealed, anyone can claim a nomination without it being verifiable, which is why serious institutions treat “Nobel-nominated” as close to meaningless.

A year of narrowing down

Once nominations close, the real work begins, and it takes most of the year. Each prize has a small working committee that sorts through the names, commissions confidential reports from outside experts, and gradually narrows a long list to a short one. For the science prizes this can mean assessing whether a discovery has genuinely held up, which is one reason laureates are often honoured decades after the work that made them famous.

The committees then send their recommendations to the full awarding body, which makes the final choice, usually by majority vote, in the early autumn. Announcements come in a set order across the first two weeks of October, and the ceremonies take place on 10 December, the anniversary of Alfred Nobel’s death.

The secrecy is real and enforced. Nominations, the names of nominators, investigations and the committees’ discussions are kept confidential and, under the rules, are not released for 50 years. When historians finally reach the older archives, they sometimes find that towering figures were passed over repeatedly, or that a famous win was closer than anyone knew.

The rules that shape the winners

A few hard constraints explain a lot about who does and does not win. In the science categories a prize can be shared, but by no more than three people. That cap has become increasingly awkward in an era when major discoveries emerge from large collaborations of dozens or even hundreds of researchers, and it regularly leaves out people who did essential work.

There is also, since a rule change in 1974, a strong bar against awarding the prize to someone who has died. A Nobel is not normally given posthumously; the main exception is when a laureate dies after the announcement but before the December ceremony. Because scientific recognition can take a long time to arrive, the no-posthumous rule means some deserving figures miss out simply by not living long enough.

These structures matter well beyond the ceremony. The prizes shape how societies decide which knowledge counts, whose stories get read, and which peacemakers are remembered. That is a theme worth watching across the wider world of https://pqrnews.com/category/culture/ and its institutions, and it connects to bigger questions in https://pqrnews.com/category/science/ about how discovery is credited and rewarded. The awarding bodies publish their own accounts of the rules and past laureates through the official Nobel Prize organisation, and understanding how the process works is a small lesson in reading the news carefully, the kind of clarity https://pqrnews.com/about-pqr-news/ tries to bring to complicated systems.

Why the process still matters

For all its quirks, the Nobel model has proved durable. Its confidentiality shields committees from lobbying, and its broad, international pool of nominators is meant to keep any one nation from capturing the awards. Those same features draw steady criticism: the secrecy makes the prizes hard to scrutinise, the three-person cap feels out of step with modern teamwork, and the historical record of who was overlooked, including many women and researchers outside Europe and North America, is uncomfortable.

None of that has dented the prizes’ hold on the public imagination. When the calls go out from Stockholm and Oslo each October, they still send a signal the whole world hears: that a piece of science, a body of writing, or an act of peacemaking has been judged, by a long process, to have changed something for the better. Knowing how that judgement is reached makes the announcements easier to read for what they are.

Sources

• The Nobel Prize (official)
• Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences
• Nobel Peace Prize (Norwegian Nobel Committee)
• Encyclopaedia Britannica

Related from Culture